Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

99 F.3d 1133

Docket No. 96-7028.

Wingo v. King

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Oct. 17, 1996/ Decided Oct. 25, 1996.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1996-10-25

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Darryl L. Wright v. Larry E. Oliver, Lieutenant Eddie Frazier, Detective

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1996-10-25

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Billy Truman Wingo, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Campbell Alexander, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Judge. (CA-96-365)

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wingo v. King, No. CA-96-365 (W.D.Va. June 25, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/99/f3d/1133 · .json · Public domain