McQueen v. Scroggy’s Empirical Analysis
99 F.3d 1302 · 1996
Citation profile
97 federal appellate · 8 district · 21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 254 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2024 · most notably State v. Hale (2008), 153 Ohio St. 3d 497 - State v. Beasley (2018)
97 federal appellate · 8 district · 21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Wainwright v. Sykes · Gregg v. Georgia · Cuyler v. Sullivan · United States v. Cronic
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 254 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]e agree with those circuits that have held that a Rule 60(b) motion is the practical equivalent of a successive habeas corpus petition,”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'[t]here is no constitutional prohibition against jurors simply knowing the parties involved or having knowledge of the case.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“In what kinds of cases do you think the death penalty is warranted?”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.