Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 99 F.3d 280 - Meadows v. Delo

Meadows v. Delo’s Empirical Analysis

99 F.3d 280 · 1996

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
June 2025
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently June 2025

10 federal appellate · 1 district ·

1501996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Schlup v. Delo · Herrera v. Collins · United States v. Rogers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “must show 'a reasonable probability that the error affected the trial's outcome.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.