Garrett v. Groose’s Empirical Analysis
99 F.3d 283 · 1996
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently May 2016
10 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Melendez v. United States · State v. Garrett · Nachtigall v. Class · Washington v. Delo · Smith v. Armontrout
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[c]riminal law presumes that individuals are competent . . . and a finding of competence, once made, continues to be presumptively correct until some good reason to doubt it is presented.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Holt v. Bowersox · James v. Iowa
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.