United States v. Schmidt’s Empirical Analysis
99 F.3d 315 · 1996
Citation profile
30 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently November 2016 · most notably United States v. Palomba (1999), United States v. Musa (2000)
30 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3551 (Mandatory Victims Restitution Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3565 · 18 U.S.C. § 3583 · 18 U.S.C. § 3621 · 18 U.S.C. § 3624 · 18 U.S.C. § 3673
Relies on Fields v. Hartford Casualty Insurance Co. · Trans Alaska Pipeline Rate Cases · Mattiza v. Texas · Zehrbach v. United States · McCarthy v. Bronson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(c) Delayed revocation.-The power of the court to revoke a sentence of probation for violation of a condition of probation, and to impose another sentence, extends beyond the expiration of the term of probation for any period reasonably necessary for the adjudication of matters arising before its expiration if, prior to its expiration, a warrant or summons has been issued on the basis of an allegation of such a violation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“revoke a term of supervised release, and require the person to serve in prison all or part of the term of supervised release ... if the court ... finds by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant violated a condition of supervised release.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he conditions of section 3583(i) apply only when the revocation of supervised release occurs after the term of supervised release has expired.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.