Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 99 F.3d 710 - Jackson v. Widnall

Jackson v. Widnall’s Empirical Analysis

99 F.3d 710 · 1996

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
August 2021
most recently cited

14 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently August 2021 · most notably Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. City of El Paso (2003), Anderson v. Pasadena Independent School District (1999)

14 federal appellate ·

1901996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Irwin v. Department of Veterans Affairs · Brown v. General Services Administration · Library of Congress v. Shaw

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]hen, as here, the parties have been given ample opportunity to respond to the motion for summary judgment, the district judge may rule on it even after a significant delay, without giving the parties advance notice,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The motion shall be served at least 10 days before the time fixed for the hearing. The adverse party prior to the day of hearing may serve opposing affidavits.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “must be pleaded with 'factual detail and particularity,' not mere conclusionary allegations.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.