Hohn v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
99 F.3d 892 · 1996
Citation profile
30 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on United States v. Frady · Bailey v. United States · Davis v. United States · Rivers v. Roadway Express, Inc. · United States v. Hudson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right,”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“I conclude that depriving persons of the benefit of the delayed notice that conduct is innocent violates Due Process by tolerating convictions for conduct that was never criminal.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“an incorrect application of a statute by a district court, or any other court, does not violate the Constitution”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.