Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

99 Fla. 1132

128 So 494

Tindall v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 17, 1930

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1930-05-17

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1930-05-17

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently October 2015 · most notably Hall v. State (1939), 104 So. 2d 524 - Gordon v. State (1958)

2 federal appellate · 51 state decisions

140193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1I think if the record had made it sufficiently clear that the court, over the defendant's objection, permitted counsel for the State to omit the opening argument, thus requiring the argument for the defendant to be made while his counsel was kept entirely in the dark as to what the concluding argument of the State would be, the case should be reversed for the reasons stated by me in Andrews v. State, 126 So. R. 751. But the record does not show that the State Attorney made any argument at all. Therefore, the record does not show that any injury resulted to the defendant. *1144

¶2STRUM, J., concurs.

/99/fla/1132 · .json · Public domain