Amos v. Conkling’s Empirical Analysis
1930
Citation profile
47 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently June 1998 · most notably Haworth v. Chapman (1933), McConville v. Ft. Pierce Bk. Tr. Co. (1931)
47 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bryan v. Bullock · 75 Cal. App. 247 - Old Homestead Bakery, Inc. v. Marsh · State ex rel. Railroad Commissioners v. Louisville · Tampa & Jacksonville Railway Co. v. Catts · State ex rel. Railroad Commissioners v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]t is proper to consider, not only acts passed at the same session of the Legislature, but also acts passed at prior or subsequent sessions, and even those which have been repealed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“is fatal to the interests of both creditors and stockholders”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.