¶1 The orders herein appealed from were affirmed, Skipper v. Handley, 121 So. R. 792, but a rehearing was granted. Upon further consideration the Court has determined that notwithstanding the contention as to the effect of the supplemental agreement referred to in the former opinion, the facts alleged in this case bring it within the rules announced in Chubb v. Chadwick, 93 Fla. 114, 111 So. R. 538; Wilson v. Daniel, 94 Fla. 1140, 115 So. R. 527, and not within the rules stated in Taylor v. Rawlins, 86 Fla. 279, 97 So. R. 714; 35 A. L. R. 271; 90 Fla. 621, 106 So. R. 424. It is therefore considered, ordered and decreed that the former decree herein reversing the orders appealed from is vacated and it is now ordered and decreed that the orders appealed from are hereby affirmed.
99 Fla. 382
126 So 286
Skipper v. Handley
Decided February 19, 1930
Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1930-02-19
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently September 1936
1 state decisions
Relies on Taylor v. Rawlins · Taylor v. Rawlins · Chubb v. J. Harker Chadwick & Co.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1930-02-19
View the full empirical analysis of this case →