99 F. Supp. 2d 1284 - Doe v. Tenet’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 50 U.S.C. § 403H (Servicemembers Civil Relief Act)
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Santosky v. Kramer · Daniels v. Williams · Joshua Deshaney, a Minor, by His Guardian Ad Litem, and Melody Deshaney,s v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services, et al.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“latitude to control any discovery process which may be instituted so as to balance [plaintiffs'] need for access to proof which would support a colorable constitutional claim against the extraordinary needs of the CIA for confidentiality and the protection of its methods, sources, and mission.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Doe v. Tenet · Doe v. Tenet“have sufficiently stated a claim that the government violated their substantive due process rights by creating a special relationship with plaintiffs and then failing to provide for their basic needs and protect them from deprivations of liberty, or by affirmatively placing them in danger.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Doe v. Tenet · Doe v. Tenet“[r]egardless of whether a secret contract does exist, there are substantial issues and claims remaining in this case that lie outside the reach of Totten.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Doe v. Tenet · Doe v. Tenet
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.