Kalnit v. Eichler’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78T (§ 20 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78U (§ 21 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78U (§ 21d of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
Relies on Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder · Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. Green · Chiarella v. United States · Cortec Industries, Inc. v. Sum Holding L.P. · Shields v. Citytrust Bancorp, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“it is undisputed that the individual defendants, as Directors of MediaOne, had the opportunity to commit fraudulent acts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Kalnit v. Eichler“give rise to a `strong inference' of defendants' intent to deceive, manipulate or defraud MediaOne shareholders.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Kalnit v. Eichler“Plaintiffs do not... enjoy a license to base claims of fraud on speculation and conclusory allegations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Kalnit v. Eichler
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.