¶1This case presents no new or important legal question; the evidence pro and cbn as to relationship between the prosecutor and one of the jurors was confused and conflicting, •and the judge was warranted in finding that the alleged relationship did not exist; the evidence did not demand a charge *210upon, the law of involuntary manslaughter, and even if the-statement of the accused authorized a charge upon this subject, no such charge was requested; no error of law was committed at ‘the trial, and there was ample evidence to support the verdict. Judgment affirmed.
99 Ga. 209
Tillery v. State
Decided June 8, 1896
Supreme Court of Georgia · decided 1896-06-08
<p>Indictment for murder. Before Judge Hart. Laurens superior court. January term, 1896.</p>
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1896-06-08
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently September 1977
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →