Johnson v. Cunningham’s Empirical Analysis
1917
Citation profile
1 district · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently November 1941
1 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on White v. . Rintoul · Fitzgerald v. Morrissey · Kelley v. Schupp · Prime v. . Koehler · Rogers v. Empkie Hardware Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““This constituted a new contract and the forbearance is a sufficient consideration for her promise to pay the debt upon which her creditor had a right to sue.” (p. 471.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hoag v. Boyle
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.