Hinnen v. Artz’s Empirical Analysis
1917
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently February 1979
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Sun Insurance Office v. Western Woolen-mill Co. · Prentiss v. Brewer · Peterson v. Hollis · Blair v. Craddock · Winters v. Bloom
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Of course, a possession held up to the fence in the belief that it followed the surveyor’s line would not be adverse (Winters v. Bloom, 96 Kan. 443 , 151 Pac. 1109 ; 4 R. C. L. 128), nor would acquiescence in its maintenance on that supposition create an estoppel (4 R. C. L. 130).” (p. 584.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Steinbruck v. Babb
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.