Callaway v. Hubner’s Empirical Analysis
1904
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently October 2001
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Boom Company v. Patterson · Bank of Commerce v. Lanahan · Young v. Harrison · Carroll v. Hutton · Gould v. Chappell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“and if this was an element of value upon which the owner had a right to insist, it is equally an element which the trustees in the present case were bound in the exercise of due diligence and discretion, to take into consideration.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“its value was not to be restricted to its agricultural or productive capacities, but that inquiry should be made as to all purposes to which it could be applied having reference to existing and prospective wants of the community,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“what is the value of the property for the most advantageous use to which it may be applied?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.