Jenning v. Rohde’s Empirical Analysis
1906
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently July 2003
1 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Towson v. Moore · Bauer v. Bauer · Hanson v. Diamond Iron Mining Co. · Loftus-Hubbard Elevator Co. v. Smith-Alvord Co. · Tuckwood v. Hanthorn
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Tlio action was commenced to recover the snm of $200 and $1,235, respectively, alleged to have been loaned to respondents by appellant. The answer is a general denial. At the trial respondents admitted having received the money, bnt contended it was a gift. A verdict was returned for the respondents. * * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Payne v. Williams
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.