Zegman v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
September 2000
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““. . . claimant was clearly competent to testify to her past and present condition. (Vincent-Wilday, Inc. v. Strait, 273 App.Div. 1054 , 79 N.Y.S.2d 811 .) The Court does not however construe such testimony as sufficient to establish either the permanency of the injury or the possibility of future pain. [Citations omitted.]””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cain v. Stevenson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.