Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 99 Misc. 2d 523 - Goldstein v. Mangano

99 Misc. 2d 523 - Goldstein v. Mangano’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
3
states following
September 1997
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 4 district · 8 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “employer” or indirectly in the interest of an employer in relation to an employee benefit plan. 29 U.S.C. § 1002 (5). 2 . (a) ... [T]he provisions of this subchapter and subchapter III of this chapter shall supersede any and all State laws insofar as they may now or hereafter relate to any employee benefit plan____ (b) .... (4) Subsection (a) of this section shall not apply to any generally applicable criminal law of a State. 3 . Even though the Illinois Wage Payment Act ... applies to all employers and employees, ERISA preempts the Illinois statute to the extent that it regulates pension and welfare plans. While the Illinois law provides for criminal penalties, we find it is not so broad as to encompass the narrow interpretation of "generally applicable”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “under the collective bargaining agreement a definite monthly sum of $6.00 per employee was deducted from each worker's wages and, ..., the only active corporate officer was obligated to ensure that the corporation segregated these sums from the general corporate account and paid them over regularly to plaintiff.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Thus, there is a two-fold test which, when met, gives rise to a civil remedy. where there is a statutory breach. First, the cause of action must impose liability nonexistent at common law, and, second, the plaintiff must be a member of the class for whose protection the statute was enacted. [Id. at 373.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.