Young v. Hudson’s Empirical Analysis
1889
Citation profile
26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2008 · most notably Sprint Communications Co. v. APCC Services, Inc. (2008), O'Keefe v. United Railways Co. (1907)
26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Duncan v. Forgey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““An assignee of a chose.in action,.arising out of contract, may sue upon it in his own-name, though the title was passed to him only for the purpose of collection.” [See, also, 47 C. J. 35, sec. 71.]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.