State v. Lake’s Empirical Analysis
1935
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
May 1959
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on People v. . Meadows · State v. Monahan · Milbrath v. State · Edwards v. Jenkins · 50 Cal. App. 427 - People v. Riccardi
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Obviously, the information was drawn under the provisions of subdivision 2, § 11368, Rev. Codes 1921 [now R.C.M. 1947, § 94-2701]. The charge is that of larceny as agents, servants, and bailees, and is in the words of the statute. The information generally follows the statute, and we think it is good. An information which charges the offense of larceny as agent or bailee in the language of the statute is sufficient and is not vulnerable to a general demurrer. State v. Brown, 38 Mont. 309 , 99 P. 954 ; People v. Riccardi, 50 Cal. App. 427 , 195 P. 448 ; Connelly v. State, 93 Tex. Cr. R. 295 , 248 S.W. 340 . The information was sufficient, and the court was correct in overruling the demurrer.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Hale
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.