¶1This case is in principle like that of Conigland v. Smith, 79 N. C., 303, and following the decision made in that case, there was no error in the judgment of the Court below.
¶2Affirmed.
99 N.C. 236
5 S.E 235
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided February 15, 1888
Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1888-02-15
Insurance Money. This is a controversy submitted without action in compliance with § 567 et seq of The Code, and heard before Philips, J., at September Term, 1887, of MahtiN Superior Court, upon the following facts as a “ case agreed.” , “ 1. Hardy W. Mizzell and Annie M., defendant’s intestate, were married in the year 1866. “ 2.
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently September 1904
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1888-02-15
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1This case is in principle like that of Conigland v. Smith, 79 N. C., 303, and following the decision made in that case, there was no error in the judgment of the Court below.
¶2Affirmed.