¶1Contempt: Review. A conviction under contempt proceedings can only Be reviewed in the supreme court By the filing of a petition in error as in a criminal case. Gandy v. State, 13 NeB. 445; Hanilca v. State, 87 NeB. 845.
¶2Appeal dismissed.
99 Neb. 800
Decided May 13, 1916
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently June 1934
2 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1916-05-13
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1Contempt: Review. A conviction under contempt proceedings can only Be reviewed in the supreme court By the filing of a petition in error as in a criminal case. Gandy v. State, 13 NeB. 445; Hanilca v. State, 87 NeB. 845.
¶2Appeal dismissed.