Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 99 Nev. 564 - Daly v. State

Daly v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

72
cited by 72 later decisions
4
states following
March 2005
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 69 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 72 later decisions — most recently March 2005 · most notably Kazalyn v. State (1992), Greene v. State (1997)

1 federal appellate · 69 state decisions

360198319902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Patterson v. United States · Michelson v. United States · Trammel v. United States · Yazoo County Industrial Development Corp. Et Al. v. Suthoff Et Al. · United States v. Jackson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[e]vidence of a person's character or a trait of his character is not admissible for the purpose of proving that he acted in conformity therewith on a particular occasion”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “1. Opinion evidence as to the character of a witness is admissible to attack or support his credibility but subject to these limitations: (a) Opinions are limited to truthfulness or untruthfulness; and (b) Opinions of truthful character are admissible only after the introduction of opinion evidence of untruthfulness or other evidence impugning his character for truthfulness.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.