Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 99 N.M. 351 - Jeffers v. Doel

Jeffers v. Doel’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
October 2020
most recently cited

2 district · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently October 2020

2 district · 14 state decisions

10019821990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pharmaseal Laboratories, Inc. v. Goffe · Arias v. Springer · Aboud v. Adams · Montgomery v. Cook · Sims v. Craig

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The purpose of the [recording] statute is to prevent injustice by protecting innocent purchasers for value without notice of unrecorded instruments who have invested money in property.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.