Perez v. Brubaker’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently December 2001
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Heckathorn v. Heckathorn · State Ex Rel. Kermac Nuclear Fuels Corp. v. Larrazolo · Campos v. Brown Construction Company · Roberson v. Powell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The language of the statute is clear. The jurisdictional prerequisite is that there must be application made to the medical review commission and its decision on the application before the action can be filed in the trial court.... Any rulings regarding the merits are a nullity absent this jurisdictional prerequisite.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Rupp v. Hurley · Rupp v. Hurley“[n]o malpractice action may be filed in any court against a qualifying health care provider before application is made to the medical review commission and its decision is rendered.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Otero v. Zouhar · Rupp v. Hurley“only had authority to determine if it had the power to act on the merits.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Otero v. Zouhar
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.