Robison v. Campbell’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
March 2008
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Alvado v. General Motors Corp. · Fryar v. Johnsen · Northern Pueblos Enterprises. v. Montgomery · Robison v. Katz · Prichard v. Fulmer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The rescission ultimately obtained by Katz involved attorneys other than the Sutin firm in the prior appeal and the trial after remand. The trial court could properly consider the part palyed by the Sutin firm in the ultimate recovery and determine that “equitable relief for a reasonable fee” should be the $25,000.00. See Northern Pueblos, supra. There was no abuse of discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Robison v. Katz“The motion sought to reopen, on the basis of newly discovered evidence, the question of whether there should be a rescission. The motion was properly denied; Campbell did not show an entitlement to relief under either R.Civ.Proc. 59 or 60(b)(2), N.M.S.A. 1978 (1980 Repl. Pamph.).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Robison v. Campbell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.