99 Ohio App. 175
132 N.E.2d 123
58 OhioOp. 305
Decided April 18, 1955
Ohio Court of Appeals · decided 1955-04-18
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1955-04-18
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently September 2023
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 concurs in the judgment.
¶2 I concur in the judg-
¶3 ment affirming the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas for the reason that Seitz, being the dominant owner only and not the owner of the fee or servient estate to the east 12 feet of the “south one-half of the west two-thirds of lot number twenty-one (21) on Jackson Street in said city” could not transfer to the predecessors in title of the plaintiffs a right-of-way over that portion of lot number twenty-one.