99 Ohio App. 3d 514 - State v. Day’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently April 2024
2 federal appellate · 20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Allen · State v. Henderson · 72 Ohio App. 3d 235 - State v. Ireson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Whenever in any case it is necessary to prove a prior conviction, a certified copy of the entry of judgment in such prior conviction together with evidence sufficient to identify the defendant named in the entry as the offender in the case at bar, is sufficient to prove such prior conviction.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the state must prove the prior conviction beyond a reasonable doubt, just as it must prove any other element. The [fact finder] must find that the previous conviction has been established in order to find the defendant guilty[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]he [factfinder] must find that the prior conviction has been established in order to find the defendant guilty.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.