Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 99 Ohio App. 3d 722 - State v. Nathan

99 Ohio App. 3d 722 - State v. Nathan’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

123
cited by 123 later decisions
1
states following
November 2022
most recently cited

123 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 123 later decisions — most recently November 2022 · most notably 139 Ohio App. 3d 827 - State v. Boshko (2000), State v. Leugers, Unpublished Decision (12-28-2006) (2006)

123 state decisions

6601995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Xie · State v. Smith · 17 Ohio App. 3d 201 - State v. Blatnik · 70 Ohio App. 3d 821 - Defiance v. Cannon · 63 Ohio App. 3d 5 - State v. Hamed

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 123 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A motion to withdraw a plea of guilty or no contest may be made only before sentence is imposed; but to correct manifest injustice the court after sentence may set aside the judgment of conviction and permit the defendant to withdraw his or her plea.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “this court will not reverse a trial court's denial of a motion to withdraw a plea of guilty absent an abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “`if the facts alleged by the defendant and accepted as true would require the court to permit that plea to be withdrawn.'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.