Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 99 OHIOAPP3D 748 - State v. Moore

State v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

80
cited by 80 later decisions
2
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

80 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 80 later decisions — most recently June 2025 · most notably State v. Calhoun (1999), 120 Ohio App. 3d 122 - State v. Aldridge (1997)

80 state decisions

3001994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Dehass · Seasons Coal Co. v. City of Cleveland · Sumner v. Mata · State v. Nero · State v. Steffen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) whether the judge reviewing the postconviction relief petition also presided at the trial, (2) whether multiple affidavits contain nearly identical language, or otherwise appear to have been drafted by the same person, (3) whether the affidavits contain or rely on hearsay, (4) whether the affiants are relatives of the petitioner, or otherwise interested in the success of the petitioner's efforts, and (5) whether the affidavits contradict evidence proffered by the defense at trial. Moreover, a trial court may find sworn testimony in an affidavit to be contradicted by evidence in the record by the same witness, or to be internally inconsistent, thereby weakening the credibility of that testimony.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “[r]ecanting testimony ordinarily is unreliable and should be subjected to the closest scrutiny”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “(C) Before granting a hearing on a petition filed under division (A) of this section, the court shall determine whether there are substantive grounds for relief. In making such a determination, the court shall consider, in addition to the petition, the supporting affidavits, and the documentary evidence, all the files and records pertaining to the proceedings against the petitioner, including, but not limited to, the indictment, the court's journal entries, the journalized records of the clerk of the court, and the court reporter's transcript.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.