Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 99 OHIOMISC2D 107 - In re Hunter

In re Hunter’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 2000
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Gault · Kent v. United States · Weatherford v. Bursey · 32 Ohio St. 3d 1 - City of Lakewood v. Papadelis · In re Becker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““To allow pre-hearing motions under Juv.R. 22 to be heard prior to a Juv.R. 30 preliminary hearing would be cumbersome and time-consuming upon the court and may lead to conflicting rulings on the motions. For example, the juvenile court may rule that certain evidence is exculpatory but, subsequent to the bindover, the general division court may rule that it is not exculpatory. Pretrial motions for discovery and suppression of evidence should be decided by the court which is to preside over the trial or adjudicatory hearing.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.