Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

99 Ohio St. 3d 145

State v. Siferd

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 2003

Ohio Supreme Court · decided 2003-06-11

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently March 2017

2 state decisions

Relies on State v. Fisher

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2003-06-11

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals on Proposition of Law No. X is affirmed on the authority of State v. Fisher, 99 Ohio St.3d 127, 2003-Ohio-2761, 789 N.E.2d 222.

Robert A. Fry, Hancock County Prosecuting Attorney, and Mark C. Miller, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.David H. Bodiker, Ohio Public Defender, Angie Greene and Jerry McHenry, Assistant Public Defenders, for appellant.Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton and O’Con-nor, JJ., concur.Cook, J., not participating.
/99/ohiost3d/145 · .json · Public domain