State ex rel. Timken Co. v. Kovach’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State ex rel. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. v. Morse · State ex rel. Brinkman v. Industrial Commission · State ex rel. Ooten v. Siegel Interior Specialists Co. · 84 Ohio St. 3d 405 - State ex rel. Jones v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals Cleveland · State ex rel. Yates v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he overriding concern * * * is the desire to ensure that a lower-paying position — regardless of hours — is necessitated by the disability and not motivated by lifestyle choice.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.