State v. Harrold

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 2003

Ohio Supreme Court · decided 2003-08-27

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 2004

1 state decisions

Relies on State v. Comer

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2003-08-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded for resentencing on the authority of State v. Comer, 99 Ohio St.3d 463, 2003-Ohio-4165, 793 N.E.2d 473.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and O’Donnell, JJ., concur.O’Connor, J., concurs in judgment based only on stare decisis.Sherri Bevan Walsh, Summit County Prosecuting Attorney, and Richard S. Kasay, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.David H. Bodiker, State Public Defender, and Stephen P. Hardwick, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents for the reasons stated in Judge Grady’s dissenting opinion in State v. Comer, 99 Ohio St.3d 463, 2003-Ohio-4165, 793 N.E.2d 473.