99 Or. App. 112 - State v. Voetberg’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
3
states following
September 1999
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“For the purposes of determining the basis for restitution, the admission of a defendant is essentially the same as a plea of guilty that would support a conviction, but a judgment of conviption is not entered because of a plea bargain. Because such an admission can result in liability for substantial sums of money, defendant’s responsibility for the criminal activities ought to be firmly established.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Watson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.