State v. Powers’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently August 2023
2 federal appellate · 22 state decisions — followed in 10 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Crawford v. Washington · Ohio v. Roberts · Idaho v. Wright · White v. Illinois
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“assist in [Powers'] apprehension and prosecution, rather than to protect herself or her child from his return.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence““When a 911 call is made to report a crime and supply information about the circumstances and the people involved, the purpose of the information is for investigation, prosecution, and potential use at a judicial proceeding; it makes no difference what the caller believes. *** [A]n objective reasonable person knows that when he or she reports a crime the statement will be used in an investigation and at proceedings relating to a prosecution.” Cortes, 4 Misc. 3d at 595 , 781 N.Y.S.2d at 415 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“despite [the recording's] characterization [as an excited utterance], based on indicia of reliability and trustworthiness, Crawford clearly rejects the admission of testimonial statements based on `the vagaries of the rules of evidence, much less . . . amorphous notions of”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.