Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 99 PACOMMW 29 - Commonwealth v. Sabia

Commonwealth v. Sabia’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 2011
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Codispoti v. Pennsylvania · Knaus v. Knaus · In Re Martorano · Commonwealth v. Marcone · Commonwealth Ex Rel. Magaziner v. Magaziner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We agree . . . with DER that the mere passage of time does not remove a contempt action from its underpinnings-namely, an order of this Court with which the defendant has failed to comply. In this case, although two and one-half years have lapsed since this Court issued its enforcement Order, DER nonetheless bases its contempt petition on Sabia's alleged failure to comply with that Order. The contempt proceeding arises directly from and is an integral part of DER's original enforcement action.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.