Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

99 S.C. 410

83 S.E 606

Gibbes v. Hunter

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 21, 1914

Supreme Court of South Carolina · decided 1914-08-21

<p>Before Prince, J., Columbia, February, 1914.</p> <p>Action by Caroline S. Gibbes, J. Wilson Gibbes, Sarah E. David, Jennie G. Gibbes and Robert W. Gibbes against James E. Hunter, Caroline Nathalie Hunter, James E. Hunter, Jr., and the Bank of Columbia. From a decree, the defendant, the Bank of Columbia, and the plaintiff, J. Wilson Gibbes, both appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion.</p> <p>cite: Homestead has reference to the physical state of the property rather than the nature and quality of the title: 24 S. C. 36. Lands defined: 1 Nott & McC. 463; 208 Pa. St.’392. Homestead cannot be assigned out of .an undivided interest in real estate: 26 S. C. 230; 28 S. C. 133; 32 S. C. 454. The claimant must have a right to possession: 47 S. C. 301; 26 S. C. 18; 87 N. C. 79. Sale of remainder under execution: 82 S. C. 137; 27 S. C. 162; 23 S. C. 104. The several remaindermen and life tenant cannot each have a homestead in the same land at the same time: 20 S. E. 736; 26 E. R. A. 814. Right does not attach until homestead has been set off and recorded: Const., art. IH, sec. 28; 24 S. C. 37.</p> <p>The latter cite: Constitution, 1868, art. II, sec. 32; 2 S. C. 232; 21 S. C. 127, 133, 137. Amendment of 1880: 17 Stats. 320. Constitutional provisions construed. Legislature merely to pass laws to enforce the constitutional provisions, by providing method of assignment: 21 S. C. 379. Assignment not essential to right: 20 S. C. 248; 26 S. C. 1; 32 S. C. 266. Nor is homestead dependent on a right to present possession in severalty: 2 DeS. 430; 16 S. C. 330; 47 S. C. 305; 24 S. C. 35; 54 S. C. 579; 51 S. C. 100; 21 S. C. 379. Difficulty in assigning does not defeat right: 14 S. C. 454; 26 S. C. 229; 28 S. C. 133; 32 S. C. 170. Where there is a right of homestead in land worth less than $1,000.00 it cannot be levied upon and sold under execution: 32 S. C. 266; 37 S. C. 118; 73 S. C. 329; 46 S. C. 70; 26 S. C. 1. The right to homestead precedes the assignment. Partition only sustained where the parties are entitled to possession: 29 S. C. 370; 51 S'. C. 208; 56. S. C. 304, distinguished. The property designated by Gibbes in i8p8 then became fixed as his homestead: 37 S. C. 102, 118, 119; 51 S. C. 100.</p>

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Modified · Decided 1914-08-21

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently October 2011

1 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

2019141920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Mr. Justice Hydrick,

¶1 dissenting. I dissent from the proposition that the interest of J. Wilson Gibbes in the property in excess of $1,000 in value is now free from the lien of the bank’s judgment.

/99/sc/410 · .json · Public domain