Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 99 SW3D 4 - Muenz v. Muenz

Muenz v. Muenz’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
July 2011
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Murphy v. Carron · Hill v. Hill · Brooks v. Brooks · Marriage of Drikow v. Drikow · Shelton v. Shelton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “imputed from these accounts based on the facts and circumstances of each case — including the cost to convert the account into cash, the age of the parties, their intent as to investmeni/consumption/retirement, the relative division of marital property and marital debts, and any equitable adjustment for reasonably certain taxes and penalties.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “fail[ed] to set forth the necessary information to determine what income from the IRA and retirement accounts apportioned [to the spouse seeking maintenance] as marital property the trial court considered in calculating maintenance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “to set forth the necessary information to determine what income from ... IRA and retirement accounts apportioned to [the spouse seeking maintenance] as marital property the trial court considered in calculating maintenance”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.