Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 99 S.W.3d 546 - Faustlin v. Mathis

Faustlin v. Mathis’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
April 2009
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Murphy v. Carron · Hoag v. McBride & Son Inv. Co., Inc. · Chapman v. Lavy · Christomos v. Holiday Inn Branson · Seaton v. Weir

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whether a road is public or private is determined by the extent of the right to use it, not by the extent to which that right is exercised or by the quantity of travel over it. A public roadway exists if the use of the roadway is free and common to all citizens, and [ ] the public has actual access to it. This determination is not wholly dependent on the roadways length, or on the place to which it leads, or on the number • of people who use it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “'The elements of common law dedication are: (1) the owner, by unequivocal actions, intended to dedicate the land to public use; (2) the public accepted the dedicated land; and (3) the public is using the dedicated land.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “indicated that the public traditionally had access to and the right to make use of the roadway, however infrequent such travel may have occurred”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.