Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 99 U.S. 1 - Wolf v. Stix

Wolf v. Stix’s Empirical Analysis

99 U.S. 1 · 1878

Citation profile

70
cited by 70 later decisions
16
cited 16 times by the Supreme Court
17
states following
June 1982
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 4 district · 27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 70 later decisions (16 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 1982 · most notably Upshur v. Briscoe (1891), Hennequin v. Clews (1884)

9 federal appellate · 4 district · 27 state decisions — followed in 17 states

190187818801890190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Neal v. Clark · Riggin v. Magwire · Carpenter v. Turrell · Odell v. Wootten

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “positive fraud, or fraud in fact involving moral turpitude or intentional wrong* as does embezzlement, and not implied fraud or fraud in law* which may exist without .the imputátion of bad faith or immorality.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The debt thus created was provable under the bankrupt act. It was payable upon the happening of an event which might never occur, and was therefore contingent. The bond was in full force when the petition in bankruptcy was filed. The sum to be paid was certain in amount Whether the event would ever occur which would require the payment was uncertain; but, if it did occur, the amount to be paid was fixed. This clearly is such a case as was provided for. in section 5008, Rev. St., which is that, ‘in all cases of contingent debts and contingent liabilities contracted by the bankrupt, * * * the creditor may make claim therefor, and have his claim allowed, with the right to share in the dividends, if the contingency happens before the order for the final dividend.’ ””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “no discharge shall release, discharge or affect any person liable for the same debt for or with the bankrupt, either as partner, joint contractor, indorser, surety- or otherwise.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.