Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 99 U.S. 592 - Terhune v. Phillips

Terhune v. Phillips’s Empirical Analysis

99 U.S. 592 · 1878

Citation profile

60
cited by 60 later decisions
16
cited 16 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
December 1939
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 60 later decisions (16 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 1939 · most notably Potts v. Creager (1895), Vicksburg v. Putnam (1886)

8 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions

2601878188018901900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brown v. Piper

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We cannot fail to take judicial notice that the thing patented was known and in general use long before the issuing of the patent. The substitution of metal for wood was destitute both of patentable invention and utility.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.