99 Wash. 2d 326 - Farris v. Munro’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
36 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently April 2022 · most notably 122 Wash. 2d 371 - Yakima County (West Valley) Fire Protection District No. 12 v. City of Yakima (1993), Greater Harbor 2000 v. City of Seattle (1997)
36 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 77 Wash. 2d 94 - Washington Natural Gas Co. v. Public Utility District No. 1 · 85 Wash. 2d 859 - Darrin v. Gould · 96 Wash. 2d 201 - Cathcart-Maltby-Clearview Community Council v. Snohomish County · State ex rel. Blakeslee v. Clausen · State ex rel. Hudd v. Timme
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health or safety, support of the state government and its existing public institutions....”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“The primary objection to amendments with more than one subject is that the voters must approve or disapprove the entire measure as a whole, rather than vote separately for or against each subject. Farris v. Munro, 662 P.2d 821, 825 (Wash. 1983). Véanse, también: Keenan v. Price, 195 P.2d 662 (1948); State v. Wetz, 168 N.W. 835 (1918); McBee v. Brady, 100 P. 97 (1909). (12)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“This act is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or safety, or support of the state government and its existing public institutions, and shall take effect immediately.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Clean v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.