State v. Gary J.E.’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
July 2008
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Burks v. United States · Ashe v. Swenson · Yates v. United States · 108 Wash. 2d 299 - McDaniels v. Carlson · 107 Wash. 2d 346 - State v. Knapstad
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“No order of dismissal or directed verdict of not guilty on the ground of a variance between the indictment or information and the proof, or on the ground of any defect in such indictment or information, shall bar another prosecution for the same offense. Whenever a defendant shall be acquitted or convicted upon an indictment or information charging a crime consisting of different degrees, he cannot be proceeded against or tried for the same crime in another degree, nor for an attempt to commit such crime, or any degree thereof.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. GARY JE“any touching of the sexual or other intimate parts of a person done for the purpose of gratifying sexual desire of either party[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. GARY JE
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.