State v. Whitfield’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 2004
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 101 Wash. 2d 612 - State v. Acosta · 108 Wash. 2d 125 - State v. Pascal · 120 Wash. 2d 913 - State v. Hutsell · 108 Wash. 2d 491 - State v. Nelson · State v. Riley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The court's finding is amply supported by the record. The State also challenges the trial court's finding that Lanetta,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Whitfield“Lanetta began a controversial, confrontational, and accusatory conversation with [Morris].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Whitfield“the victim provoked the incident. Although the trial court did not use the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Whitfield
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.