99 Wash. App. 400 - State v. Breazeale’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Bell v. United States · Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Bros. · 97 Wash. 2d 30 - Seattle Times Co. v. Ishikawa · State v. Adel · 121 Wash. 2d 205 - Allied Daily Newspapers v. Eikenberry
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“disposition of criminal records is a matter that would appear to be related to the punishment and reformation of offenders. Such functions ... are uniquely within the Legislature's domain.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Noel“To `vacate' is to annul, set aside, cancel or rescind; to render an act void, as in `to vacate an entry of record, or a judgment.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Noel“State v. Breazeale, 99 Wash.App. 400, 408 , 994 P.2d 254 (2000) (quoting BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY 1548 (6th ed.1990)).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Noel
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.