99 Wash. App. 662 - State v. Vreen’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently June 2021
24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Swain v. State of Alabama · Lewis v. United States · United States v. Martinez-Salazar · 79 Wash. 2d 12 - State Ex Rel. Carroll v. Junker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“How can an appellate court determine the degree of harm resulting from the participation of any particular juror in the jury’s deliberations? There is no record of jury deliberations. Whether you place the burden upon the State (the peremptory challenge error did not affect the jury verdict) or upon the defendant (the defendant was prejudiced by the presence of a particular juror on the jury), the bearer of the burden of persuasion would likely fail.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. McLean“[a] person can choose to be careless and is less likely to be careless with a loved one in the car.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Vreen“a party must be able to state on the record a legally sufficient reason for the challenge.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.