Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 99 W. Va. 582 - Drake v. O'Brien

99 W. Va. 582 - Drake v. O'Brien’s Empirical Analysis

1925

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
3
states following
March 2014
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 2014

1 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

301925193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hunt v. Rousmanier's Administrators · Badger v. Badger · Mechanics' Bank of Alexandria v. The Bank of Columbia · Taylor v. Benham · Markey v. Langley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"It is a universal rule that a power coupled with an interest is irrevocable. * * * Not even the death or the insanity of the grantor or donor will annul or suspend its exercise. * * * In other words, the power is annexed to the property, and is an irrevocable part of the security, and goes with it." [Emphasis added.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “"Where the power is coupled with an interest so that it may be exercised in the name and as the act of the donee of the power, the death of the person who conferred the power has no effect upon it." [Emphasis added.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “By the phrase `coupled with an interest' is not meant an interest in the exercise of the power, but an interest in the property on which the power is to operate.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.