Com. v. AR’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 2013
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Commonwealth v. Gee · 2008 Pa. Super. 271 - Commonwealth v. Ahmad · Commonwealth v. Mullins · Raker v. Raker · 2007 Pa. Super. 411 - Commonwealth v. Shrawder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he results obtained from the administration of a therapeutic polygraph examination in a sexual offenders’ treatment program are admissible at a probation revocation hearing as evidence to support the underlying violation, ie., a sexual offender’s lack of amenability to treatment, so long as [1) ] the results of that examination are not the sole basis for the revocation petition; [2) ] they do not reveal uncharged criminal conduct on the part of the defendant; and [3) ] they are not used for purposes of the investigation of criminal conduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Commonwealth v. A.R.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.